Most damaging Wikileaks.

Go ahead and add this list of the 100 most damaging pieces of information supplied by Wikileaks to your bulletin board. Pass it on to people considering voting for the witch.

A good rundown on the current situation with Hillary's emails.

For your notes, an overview of Hillary's recent email problems.

For your thought process, from Weapons Man

Confiscate this.

Things are not looking good for Clinton.

New evidence is making things things very interesting for the Clinton camp. Investigations into Anthony Weiner's texting have uncovered emails on he and his wife's computer (he is married to longtime Clinton aide, Huma Abedin) that were previously unseen by the FBI. Also, there is evidence that Clinton's private email server was hacked by at least five foreign intelligence security services (FISS) and that classified information was taken.

Adapting to the flow of information and truth

---

I think Trump and Hillary both have all of the hallmarks of a future dictatorial strongman who will trash the Constitution and attack their perceived enemies. Clinton's perceived enemies are of course Christians, men, veterans, white people, Southerners, gun owners, conservatives, etc. Trump's perceived enemies are probably a much shorter list than that, though I don't want to see any executive attacking their own perceived enemies.

I know for a fact that Hillary AIMS to dismantle the US Constitution and erode our liberties to subjugate us. While I believe Trump has the ability to do the same thing, I do NOT believe that he aims to do so. Additionally, he has surrounded himself with a number of strong Constitutionalist organizations and people, and I am ready to vote for Trump on the assumption that he is willing to keep them around and heed their advice. Without the advice of close by Constitutionalists, he will revert to his reflexes, which are to lean leftward. His complete lack of understanding of the purpose and meaning of the US Constitution as a document that is written in order to protect us from HIM (or Hillary) is something that MUST be remedied. I am willing to vote for Trump on the assumption that he has people near him that are working on this. In speeches in my home state of Florida, he has mentioned the US Constitution, which is an improvement from earlier in the campaign, when he rarely would do so.

In 1776 the revolution was begun (really 1775, or even earlier) by colonists who included statesmen, soldiers, politicians, drunkards, womanizers, bar fighters, scoundrels, antagonizers, criminals, spies and traitors (to the crown). If we are to turn the country around, we don't have enough people to do it if we exclude the usefulness of the people who do not always meet our standards. While this does not mean we need the likes of scum like John McCain or Mitch McConnell, we may very be able to use the services of people like Jeff Miller, Marco Rubio, or even Donald Trump.

I am willing to support Trump enough to vote for him (at least for today, November 2nd, because who knows what's going to happen tomorrow), though I am still not confident my vote even matters though, or will be counted correctly, so that helps my willingness to vote for him, since I'm not sure it matters anyway. I don't believe there is any voting our way out of the problems we face. But as Trump has evolved through these few months, he has evolved in a direction I can definitely support. If a candidate is able to see some light and change his views as he discovers more truth, then a person must be able to change their own actions based on that. One group of people are truly in the bag for a candidate no matter what happens, and the other group is in truly in the bag against a candidate no matter what happens. Both groups are wrong. We need to be able to adapt our views and actions as we discover more truth.

Proof that Hillary Clinton was given advance notice of questions to be asked at CNN debate.

In case you need it, here is the proof that CNN political hack Donna Brazile gave the Hillary campaign a heads up on questions to be asked at the CNN debate. Donna Brazile was let go for it, and is now the interim chair of the DNC.

What a shock.

Thanks to Wikileaks, we can all now see with our own eyes the corruption in the media and DC.

TINVOWOOT (There is no voting our way out of this)

The Outlaw and the Joker

Claire Wolfe brings a newer and better meaning of the word "outlaw" with this piece.

Be the outlaw.

Election night immediate action from James Wesley, Rawles

Odds are that the next President of the United States is unfortunately going to be Hillary Clinton. In the event that she gets elected, SurvivalBlog writer and professional survivalist and prepper James Wesley, Rawles predicts (and I fully agree) that there is a long list of goods that will become nearly impossible to find in the manner in which we find them today. Guns and ammo is what I speak of, of course, but even other things, such as buckets of pre-packaged, long-term stored food could become scarce.

Upon Hillary winning, it may very well take less than 24 hours for prices on certain weapons (AR-15 rifles, for example) and ammo (ammo FOR AR-15 rifles, for example) to skyrocket. These prices have shown precedent to triple within just a few days. The rifle you can buy tomorrow on October 26th for $675 is very likely to demand nearly $1,200 by lunchtime on November 9th. That same rifle that you see in stock covering the walls of your local gun store this week is probably going to be impossible to find by Christmas, and may very be considered illegal to own by April of 2017 (after Hillary's first 100 days in office.

Ammunition chambered in 5.56mm NATO and/or .223 Remington still has not fully recovered from the gun and ammo scare of 2012. Ammo chambered in .22LR is still impossible to find in some of the big box stores stores around the country. The price hikes and supply disappearances of a few years ago may happen again within the next month or two.

Consider this your advanced warning and act accordingly.

And you wonder why...

Trump supporters in the media and online want Constitutional Conservatives to join in and vote for him. Many of these CCs have some LEGITIMATE concerns about Trump that they would like to address. How do the Trump supporters in the media and online solve this? By calling CCs names like "purists" and "cuckservatives" and accusing them of wanting a "perfect" candidate, and also by preemptively setting up CCs as a scapegoat to blame for an election loss that has yet to occur.

And Trump supporters are confused as to why people aren't leaping into the bandwagon... Maybe they could start by NOT treating Constitutional Conservatives like crap and blaming them for something that hasn't happened yet?

Ominous Warning from Tyler Durden at ZH.

This is a warning from Zero Hedge that we as a society are nearing a breaking point. I agree.


An excerpt:

"...Hillary's so-called "basket of Deplorables are actually the most reserved, most polite, and most honest demographic in the country. They are more informed, more self-reliant, and among other things, better armed. Regarding their arms, they are incredibly responsible, and not the source of the violence for which the implement, and not the person, is too often blamed. The Deplorables have the longest fuse. It is, however, a fuse."