Gilletes anti male/feminist campaign is simply corporate collusion.

Many of you may have seen gillette's new add showing men as bumbling rapists and bullies and playing into the anti male toxic masculinity feminist program. Why would a company that has catered to men for generations ostracize more than half of its market? As we speak barbasol is now working on a pro man campaign mocking the millennial emasculated generation and promoting a pro male image. I was speaking with a corporate consultant who works with companies like these often. He explained this all seems like corporate collusion. Some big wigs in Gillette met with some big wigs in Barbasol and they are catering to the political divide boosting sales on each side. I may be wrong but this seems like we are being played to increase sales for people who could care less about our culture.

Should we be tolerant?

Should we as individuals or as a society be tolerant?
Why is tolerance pushed as such a virtue?
Do we even understand what this word tolerance means?
People build a tolerance to illegal and legal drugs that are harmful to them.
Heroin addicts build a tolerance that slowly kills them.
People can build a tolerance to a variety of vices and substances that harm them and eventually kill them.
We can build a psychological tolerance to violence, sexuality, immorality and various ideals and behaviors that would otherwise be shocking.
Just because we can build a psychological and physical tolerance to various things does not mean we should.
If something harms you, your loved ones or anything you value then you should not tolerate it.
You should stop all people and things that harm the ideals, things and people you love.
If someone wishes to harm your nation and culture then do not tolerate them.
If there is a ideology that sets out to destroy an ideal you hold sacred then do not tolerate it.
Tolerance is for the subverted and weak.
James Kennedy said " tolerance and apathy are the symptoms of a dying society"

Covington Catholic high school students harassed by anti christian/ anti American supremacists

As always the media is lying.
If you look in your facebook feed or any social media brainwash attempt then you will see a video circulating with a teenager with a maga hat smirking ever so slightly as a native american beats a drum chanting.
The video is generally entitled racist white teens harass and terrorize proud native american.
They show a heavily edited clip of course giving no context to what happened prior or after.
"Covington catholic high school students are harassing a poor poor native american."
Of course its a lie.
The native americans were supporting the black hebrew Israelites in a anti catholic/ anti white and anti american rant spewing their usual vitriol.
When the students stood there watching their display the poor poor " native american" approached them and beat a drum in their face and the brave young man just stood there unscathed and unafraid.
His crime is that he is not a coward.
Watch the full video.
The media claims the black hebrew Israelites are simply African Americans preaching the bible when this group of white catholic thugs charged them with no reason.
The left wing media is always lying they never tell the truth reject everything they say.
They may actually tell the truth at some point in the future but we will not know it because 80- 90 percent of left wing media is a lie.

A border solution.

Whether we have a border wall built or not, and it’s my opinion that we will likely never have one built, the US border with Mexico is going to require manpower and non-wall/fence infrastructure if our leaders are serious about securing it, which I believe they are not.

It’s my opinion, based on my time spent in Korea near the DMZ and Afghanistan in many Forward Operating Bases (FOB) and Combat Outposts (COP), that our border can and should be secured using military forces and FOBs. The border with Mexico is about 3,100km in length, and in my experience, a FOB with enough personnel and technology would be able to secure a 50-60km section of border.

When I was in Afghanistan, we used small blimps tethered to the ground for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR). A single “Aerostat” with cameras, radars and laser rangefinders can monitor the ground on the border in a 30km radius. That’s 30km to the East and 30km to the West, 60 km. The same Aerostat can monitor the air with radar in a 200nm radius, giving a radar span of 400nm.

I believe that if we started with the idea that each installation could cover 50-60km, that would require 53 FOBs. If we acknowledge that some terrain is impossible to cross, we could get that number to 50 exactly. If we further acknowledge that some areas of the border are less often used for illegal activity, again perhaps due to terrain, some of those FOBs could be reduced to smaller COPs, therefore requiring lower levels of staffing. Additionally, some of the areas of the border are already heavily watched and monitored, and while I feel that security needs to be strongly increased in those areas, we would not need to build a FOB or COP in those areas. I’m talking about places like San Diego and El Paso.

I believe that it would be appropriate to line our border with anywhere from 35-40 installations, with most of those intstallations being FOBs and the rest being smaller COPs. The US has operated hundreds of installations in Afghanistan and hundreds more in Iraq for years and years. 35-40 of these are certainly doable to protect the border.

During my time in Afghanistan, I traveled to numerous FOBs and COPs, with most of those bases containing anywhere from 60-600 people. I am not including the super FOB airfields that contained several thousand troops and civilian personnel. If I was in charge, I would staff each FOB/COP with active duty US Army troops on 6 month “deployments”, with Army Reserve and National Guard troops rotating in for their monthly (or even annual two-week long exercise) training a few times per year. I would also staff the bases with varying amounts of personnel from the US Marines and Air Force, CBP, ICE, DEA, BATFE, FBI, NRO, US Marshals and FBI as needed for duties contained in their scope of authority and expertise. State, county and city LEOs would also be ordered and assigned to work closely with any FOB/COP in their jurisdiction.

Even if we staffed each base with around 600 people, that would only equal about 25,000 people (I rounded up by about a thousand) for these bases in addition to what is already on the border at the present time. Most of these personnel would be active duty military and new CBP officers.

This manpower is entirely feasible. The US currently has over 14,000 troops in Afghanistan. We have over 28,000 in South Korea (where I saw what REAL border security looks like). There are currently about 5,000 troops in Iraq, where ISIS no longer holds any territory at all. There are over 2,000 acknowledged US troops in Syria, and I would estimate that there could be as many as 2,500-3,000 in total. If we can manage hot zones like those, spare tens of thousands more in other locations like Germany, Italy and Japan and still maintain MOST of our forces inside the US, then we absolutely CAN afford that manpower for that. And don’t tell me we can’t afford to maintain those bases financially. We’ve been doing it for nearly two decades in multiple war zones. Just conjure up more digital money. That is now literally how the Western “capitalist” economy works, unfortunately.

Please note, I would not reduce or take away from any existing border security measures or personnel. This plan would be all ADDITIONAL personnel and infrastructure, and I would put it in place whether we build a wall or not.

Lastly, all technology required and useful for border security would be requisitioned. Drones for ISR and targeting, ground sensors where appropriate, JSTARS flyovers to detect cartel hardware, so on and so forth. If these assests have to be pulled from active combat zones or other overseas “contingency operations”, then so be it

If anyone is in regular contact with one Donald J. Trump, please pass this information along to him.

Salon propaganda against christians

As always Salon with its anti American, anti white and anti christian propaganda has now published an article accusing Christians of all having brain damage without exception.
To be precise they are accusing religious fundamentalists of having brain damage and frontal lobe disorders.
Interesting fact is that the thumbnail/photo for this article includes a picture of the bible and several white/light skinned hands laying over the cover.
Interesting how the left is always screaming about inclusiveness but for some reason could not bother to include the Quran and the hands of african Americans or other skin tones.
So demographically more non European people are much more devout to their faiths than western society so is Salon accusing blacks, asians, arabs and various other ethnic and racial demographics of being mentally deranged?
interesting how they only use a bible in the photo and they feel the need to use light skinned hands.
link to the propaganda trash article. https://www.salon.com/2019/01/08/a-link-between-brain-damage-and-religious-fundamentalism-has-now-been-established-by-scientists_partner/

Have we all already accepted the "mark of the beast".

The Bible states that we will see "the mark of the beast" implanted in our hands and/or foreheads.

Is it the cellphone that is the mark? Instead of implanting it, have they simply just convinced us all to carry it with us literally every moment of every day?

Is it not already in your hand at this moment? Do we not already have millions and millions of people who's phones are always at the forefront (forehead) of their minds?

If criticizing Islam is Islamophobia then what should we call attacks on christianity?

Islamofascist's and leftists consider any critical discussion of Islam to be Islamophobia and something that can not be tolerated. 

If this is the game they are playing then the only way to beat them is to push back harder. 

What should we call anti Christian attacks and criticism? Christophobia perhaps? 

We need to make the political left and Islamofscits and Jewish supremacists afraid  of Christians.

We need to have them afraid  of legal action the second they criticize christians.

Of course they will laugh at us at first the same way they dismiss anti white sentiment as something that does not exist or the leftist slogan anti white is not a thing"  but we need to push this as hard as possible. 

mind you the majority of christians in the world are not white so we have leverage on this front. 

Mind you when whites are attacked with accusations of being anti semetic, anti jewish, anti Muslim, or any other attack they use we need to respond with " that is not a thing" laugh at them and dismiss them with a set of a apologetics. 

For example the left denies that white people exist and have a culture or any identity worth preserving.

Let the leftists know that you do not identity as " white" and that you are disgusted that they tried to assume your race. 

Quote prominent anti white leftists that assert that being white is a social construct without value and then manipulate them back. 

Its time for us to fight dirty. 

The left will try to destroy the IQ test.

The IQ test and it's results are a stark reminder of the major intellectual differences between races, ethnicities and people of different geographical regions. It's been pretty sufficiently proven as a predictor of future success vs failure in long term life in a lot of varying realms, such as financial.

The average IQ of a white western person is around 104, a western Jew about 106 and Asians are around 108. The average Hispanic is around 95, with the average American black registering an average of 85. Sub-Saharan Africans come in at 70-75.

These racial discrepancies point toward there being an actual biological difference between the races. Therefore, the leftists can not abide this. Mark my words, the concept of the IQ test is going to be heavily attacked by leftists as more and more people discover these major differences and learn what they mean.

Unlocking the mind of a political leftist

Before I began understanding the American left wing/ right wing paradigm I was baffled by the hypocrisy the so called liberals demonstrated.

They were always consistently intellectually inconsistent. 

They would obsess over minority rights on every corner of the earth. 

If a ethnic or racial minority faced any level of disparagement, inequality, or difficulty in any country at the hands of european christians they were emotionally worked up into a frenzy ready to demonstrate their disgust and rage at the perceived infractions against the said minority group. 

But when I wished to discuss the violence and unjust acts against white minority groups in regions of Africa or various other countries through out the world the leftists would always act in a dismissive or uninterested manner towards the violence against christians and people of European stock. 

If you tried to discuss afrikaner children and infants  being brutally murdered in racially charged attacks the face of the average leftist glazed over with a look of apathy while others would be enraged with me for brining up the subject and then accuse me of being a racist for being concerned about the existence and well being of white minorities. 

If christian communities were being slaughtered in the middle east the leftists would instantly switch the topic to the crusades and bring up christian violence and do all they could to derail the conversation or do all they could to prove that christians are just as bad as ISIS and that being worried about the lives of Christian people be they white, black or any other race or ethnic creed made me islamophobic. 

 The same leftists were always emotionally worked into a frenzy when there were reports of evil white supremacists pulling hijabs off the heads of Muslims women however they laugh when they would see films from monty python mocking the crucifixion of christ and support federal funds going to artists who smear fece on statues of saints and mother mary but they were outraged that any non muslim would dare criticize Islam in the slightest way. 

This all baffled me and I could not understand why the political left was behaving in such a irrational inconsistent manner. 

Eventually I learned how progressives and fabian socialists had been working to subvert society into adopting ideals that were geared to create a new breed of man that could be controlled and subverted with the greatest of ease. 

I began reading the works of Huxley and Orwell and I learned that there were social engineering plans that had been set forth since the turn of the century by globalists working to brainwash our society into a group of non thinking lemmings that a small sect of oligarchs could do what they pleased with. 

I then learned of the social engineering schemes of the Marxists and how the soviets began using the same tactics through media and academia to subvert the west into thinking insane ideals that were against their best interest with the intent to topple capitalist nations.

Now it has become more complex the left is being manipulated by Chinese physiological subversion. 

The soviets are gone but the Chinese are now running internet media that works to subvert the political left. 

But it does not end there we now have islamofascist propaganda and subversion coming from various middle easter nation states working to further subvert the left with their own agendas that are a new breed of various forms of middl eastern nationalism and islamofascism. 

The Islamic agitators and media are willing to criticize china however china is willing to criticize the Islamic sects and the globalists are willing to criticize anyone who is not an unthinking, open borders lemming. 

Zionists have been working to subvert the left and right wing of America but the political tides are changing as more and more of the left is becoming anti zionist due to the islamofascist propaganda and some are even becoming anti Jewish. 

What they all have in common and what is always consistent within the leftist circles is that they hate the west, they hate capitalism, they hate free markets, they hate western culture and its people. 

Whites/ European people are always the enemy, Christianity is always subject to criticism and ridicule while all other religions are sacred as are all non white racial groups. 

The left hates tradition and western culture. 

They are uncaring and uninterested in the well being of people descended from western culture and christianity as far as they are concerned is an extension of western culture. 

If Iraqi and Syrian christians are being killed they are not interested because its a never ending game of rock, paper, scissors with the left. 

Christianity is apart of the programming they are engineered to hate.

They are incapable of restructuring their thought patterns even though christianity is a middle eastern religion and most Syrians and Iraqis are not what the left would define as " white" that does not matter they are connected to the religion of what they left has been indoctrinated to see as oppressive and further research and thought would cause the propaganda wiring to blow a fuse so christians in the middle east even though they are endangered minorities are not going to yield sympathy from the left.

Afrikaners are not going to be on the table for discussion because they are descended of christian white Europeans and if you prove that violence against whites in North America, Europe or any other part of the world is a problem most leftist will end the conversation with condoning that violence. 

They are against guns and weapons but they love che and castro men who lived by the AK 47, they love Nelson Mandela even though the man had an arsenal that would make any right wing militia look like the boy scouts. 

In the end its simple the left has been brainwashed to see the west as bad and all others nations as good however this is changing with the push of chinese subversion and islamofascist subversion. 

Soon it will become very strange and confusing. 

Jews will no longer be sacred to much of the left and they will turn on them if the islamofascist get the upper hand and I am sure the Chinese will have some interesting tactics and tricks up their sleeve.